Showing posts with label shin splints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shin splints. Show all posts

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Quick Update

It's been a busy week, so just a quick update as we hurtle towards marathon day.

I did as I was told & didn't run or otherwise exert myself over the weekend. Most of the time that's enough to take care of sore shin splints, but these guys continued to give me trouble, even walking, all weekend. There was some improvement, though, so I attempted an easy 20 minute jog on Monday as instructed. By then, the left side felt almost normal, but the right side was still in a lot of pain and I was quite happy to be done when my 20 minutes were up.

On Tuesday my assignment was 40 minutes. I wasn't feeling super-confident about this, but I decided that I'd give it a shot, and worst case, I could always stop after 20 or 30. I made it all the way through and with noticeably less pain than Monday, though I still would have described things as a bit touch-and-go.

Wednesday morning we flew out to Spokane, and because I am just that lucky/coordinated, I managed to roll my right ankle walking to the BART station and spent much of the rest of the day half-limping. It was a good thing I hadn't planned on running over Thanksgiving, because if there had been any chance of it before, there was absolutely *no* way it was happening now.

You know what's good for messed-up joints, though? FEASTING.

And there has been a lot of excellent feasting.

Thankfully, after a couple of days, it's just kind of sore and I can walk on it normally with no trouble. The shin splints seem more or less healed, but I'm reserving judgment until I have a chance to run on them on Tuesday.

This is the part where I wish I had a stronger background in biology & kinesiology & all that. On November 13, I felt like I was ready to crush this race. By the time I'm next able to get a run in, two weeks will have passed during which I've run a grand total of 12.6 miles. Yes, my lower legs will be healthy and rested, but I don't have much sense of how long "peak" marathon shape cardiovascular-wise holds up with basically no running or what the real purpose of these last race week workouts will be.

I've been distracting myself from these thoughts by looking at the weather report. A couple of days ago, the Dec. 2 forecast was 40 degrees in the morning with a 50% chance of thunderstorms. I like today's better:

Yep; I vote we just hold onto that one for the next week.

Friday, November 16, 2012

CIM Week 12 of 14: Two Steps Forward...

I am sitting on the couch right now (Friday evening) in a not insignificant amount of pain. Half an hour ago I was mentally drafting a post about the unreasonable, horrific, debilitating nature of my pain, but it has abated somewhat now so I will just say that I am very, very uncomfortable. It's nothing catastrophic--just some of the same old medial tibial shin splints that I've dealt with more or less my whole life. With a few days of rest I should be fine. Still, I'm powerful annoyed.

(In case it's not clear, those are ice packs stuffed under there.)

Here's how the week went down:

Last Sunday, I had a fantastic 21 miler except for 1) running it a little too fast, & 2) some cramping & tenderness in the outside edge of my left foot. I have a feeling that it's not completely unrelated to this and this. It got worse over the course of the course of the evening, & by Sunday night I could barely put weight on it, which was concerning. I limped around on it on Monday & took it easy at karate, but by Tuesday morning it felt pretty much normal. #winning

Tuesday: 2 wu + 1600m @ 7:00, 1:30 jog + 2 x (800m @ 6:45, 1:00 jog) + 1600m @ 7:00 + 1.5 cd. I figured I would jog a couple of warm-up miles, then decide based on how my foot felt how much I thought I could do & how fast. My legs felt tired, but my foot was pain-free so I did the whole thing, hit all my paces, & felt totally fine. Plus I had Kimra there to keep my spirits up, which was a great help. :) #winning

This is where medial tibial shin splints show up. The bizarro toe is not part of the condition.
Thursday: 4 "easy." I had six easy miles scheduled, but within a mile and a half I could tell it was going to be one of those runs. No matter how I tried to modify my gait (never a good sign), the medial tibial part of my shins were absolutely throbbing with pain. By 1.75 miles, it was really bad--like someone slicing the soft tissue away from the bone behind my tibias with a paring knife. Very briefly part of me went "Five, we are HARD CORE and we can make it to five!" (as in 2.5 out & back), but the rational part of me shut that down pretty quickly. "We're hard core, not stupid," it insisted. "Let's try not to confuse the two." Nope; I was turning around at two and that was all there was to it. Even so, I more or less hobbled through the last mile, sick at my stomach over the pain. Cue wrapping & icing. #notwinning

Friday: 2 wu + 4 @ 7:25 + 10 x (100m @ 6:00) + 1.5 cd. 2 "easy." My shins were still feeling tender Friday afternoon and I wasn't at all confident that I would be able to get much running done. Lately, though, when I'm not feeling so hot, I've been telling myself that I have to at least try. That it's okay if I can't do my whole workout or can't do it as fast, but what is not negotiable is putting on running clothes & going out there to at least confirm that I'm not up to whatever it is rather than just assuming (because 9 times out of 10 I'm wrong).

I went to the track to do this one because of the softer surface in case it helped (and also because there is no way in hell I'm doing 6:00 100's anywhere else), but I wasn't even one warm-up lap in before things started going downhill. At first it was just a mild achey-ness, but by 1.5 the slicey-stabby feeling from Thursday was back. Also, I just felt completely exhausted & out of gas. I experimented a little with how fast I could even run, but 7:45 was the best I could do, and after one or two hundred yards of that I felt like I was about to collapse. Nope; 7:25s were definitely off the table. I finished the 2 warm up miles, packed it in, & spent another hour on the couch wrapped & icing. #REALLYnotwinning

I also shot an email to Coach Tom, who I have been working with some this cycle, outlining all this. ("Coaching" is probably too strong a word, but he is responsible for my training plan & lets me email him questions from time to time.)

"Does this make any kind of sense to you? Is it possible that the long run was too fast enough to screw me up this badly for the rest of the week, or that the issue with my left foot is related to the shin splints?"

To which he responded in part:

"I think it is probably related to the LR but that wasn't such a crazy run that it is independently responsible. More likely it is the combination of all the training and you reaching the end of a tough cycle.

The MT stuff can get bad in a hurry. The best thing to do is take the weekend off. It is tough to do but the risk/reward proposition is much better (ie. If you run and get injured then you risk missing the 'thon). You're in very good shape and right now we have to focus on getting you to the line."

Done. If there is one thing I can do, it's follow instructions. No heroes up in here.

He also suggested that I try 20 minutes of easy running on Monday, & if that went well, another 40 minutes on Tuesday. I'll be out of town without anywhere to run until the Monday after Thanksgiving, so I'm trying to stay positive & look at that as a big chunk of rest / recovery time rather than big fat zeros in the training log.

I'm also trying to remind myself that nothing much of consequence happens during the last three weeks of marathon training fitness-wise -- that while you can't do a whole lot to get faster during that time, it's sure as hell PLENTY of time to get hurt or over-train or otherwise screw yourself over. So my plan is to do as Coach Tom has instructed and use this weekend to let my legs heal themselves.

Aaaaaaand, what does Angela do when she can't run for some reason?

Have a pumpkin spice muffin, darlings. By which I mean, go to this site & make them. Heaven, I tell you.

So...that's that. If anyone needs me, I'll be on the couch like a good girl, stuffing my face with seasonal baked goods. #nevertooearlytocarbload

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Strength Training Part 3: Pelvic/Core Stability

bootyStrength Training Part 1: Introduction

Strength Training Part 2: Hamstrings

Today's post is about hips & glutes. It's a long post, but frankly, in terms of bang for your buck when it comes to injury prevention, this is probably the most useful & important of this entire series. If you're only going to read all the way through one of them, I'd probably go with this one. As I learned from my PTs, it's the exceptionally rare running pain that can't ultimately be traced back to either foot strike or hip strength (excluding sudden injuries like twisting an ankle, of course).

My original plan was to do what I did for hamstrings -- start off talking about how everything works & where the injuries come from, then show some exercises. Hips & glutes are complicated, though, and by the time I finished all the "how stuff works," this post was already fairly longish. So I'm just going to post that stuff first, and then show the exercises in a different post. I am utterly fascinated by muscles & body movement & how everything works together (or doesn't), but if you're more the "just fix me" type, I won't be TOO offended if you just check out the exercises when I get them posted. ;)

(Quick Reminders:

  • I am not a doctor/PT/trainer/etc.
  • The info I have to share with you by & large comes from sports medicine doctors/PTs/trainers/etc. but has mostly come to me in the context of dealing with my own injuries.
  • If you try anything and it hurts, stop & check in with a pro
  • If you ARE a doctor/PT/exercise professional and anything here sounds sketchy or like I've misunderstood it, let me know so I can fix it!)

The Nuts & Bolts

One of the things I spent a lot of time working on when I was in physical therapy was what they call pelvic (or core) stability. Pelvic stability, as you might guess, refers to how much your pelvis wobbles around when you run.

unstable pelvisstable pelvis













The red dude has poor pelvic stability. When his left leg pushes off and leaves the ground, his left hip drops, causing his pelvis to tilt horizontally. When his right leg leaves the ground, his right hip will drop. You can see how this will cause a horizontal see-saw motion in his hips while he runs.

The blue dude has good pelvic stability. When his left leg pushes off and leaves the ground, his hips stay even. This means that his hips will stay level and even as he runs rather than see-sawing.

So why should you care about how stable your pelvis is when you run? Well, according to the physical therapists I worked with, poor pelvis stability accounts for a huge number of the running-induced overuse injuries they see. In my case it was hip pain right beneath the iliac crest, but apparently this is the kind of thing that can manifest in all kinds of exciting ways.

What an unstable core/pelvis looks like in a real runner.

Me: "Ah, interesting. I'd been kind of wondering whether it was some kind of IT band syndrome thing or something."
PT, with a shrug: "Eh, it wouldn't have changed much. IT band syndrome is often pelvic instability too."

A few sessions later:

Me: "(Blah blah blah), a few years ago when I was having all this knee pain...(blah blah blah)."
PT: "Yeah, that was probably the same thing. Pelvic instability is a pretty common cause of knee pain."

A few sessions after that:

Me: "(Blah blah blah), medial tibial shin splints on & off...(blah blah blah)."
PT: "The overpronation & hypermobility is probably causing some of that, but a lot of times MTSS is just another symptom of pelvic instability."

A few sessions after that:

Me: "Hey, at least it's not piriformis syndrome!"
PT: "Yeah, guess what I'm going to tell you about that."
Me: "So what you're saying is that pelvic instability is basically what keeps you in business around here."
PT: "Job security, man."

As one of them explained it, all these diagnoses and syndromes that are out there -- ITB syndrome, piriformis syndrome, patellafemoral syndrome, etc. -- are all just extreme manifestations of the same underlying problem, and most patients fall somewhere along a multi-dimensional spectrum in terms of their particular symptoms. A runner with persistent hip/upper leg pain obsessing over "What do I have?" is asking the wrong question. The label you attach to it, he told me, is irrelevant, because most of those things have the same root causes. They could have written "Mild ITBS" or "Mild piriformis syndrome" or "Mild TFL syndrome" on my chart for all the good it would've done, but the treatment would've been the same. (Instead they went with "general hip dysfunction / not otherwise specified.") The important question is, "What is the underlying cause?"

hip musclesOf course I'm not saying that every running pain you've ever felt in your life was a result of weak pelvic stabilizers. But I am saying that it's a problem that manifests in many different ways, and if you have a thing that's gone on a long time & you haven't had the whole pelvic stability thing checked out, it's maybe worth looking into.

So let's talk about your pelvic stability muscles. Today's cast of characters:

Hip flexors. These are the muscles that let you bend your leg or torso forward at the hip. The most important hip flexors are the psoas major & minor (fun fact: not everyone has a psoas minor, which I guess is why it's not in the picture), the iliacus, and the tensor fascia latae, or TFL.




posteriorGlutes. Your gluteal (butt) muscles let you move your leg backward at the hip. You can feel them working if you lay on your stomach and raise your leg backward up off the ground, keeping your knee straight. There are lots of gluteal muscles but the most relevant ones for us are the gluteus maximus ("glute max" for short) and the gluteus medius ("glute med," which you pronounce "glute mead").









piriformisPiriformis. Trying to explain about the piriformis is kind of hard for someone like me who is not a pro at this. Wikipedia states, "The piriformis is a flat muscle, pyramidal in shape, lying almost parallel with the posterior margin of the gluteus medius. It is situated partly within the pelvis against its posterior wall, and partly at the back of the hip-joint." I'm going to tell you it's a little pear-shaped muscle deep in your butt muscles. If you stand up and raise one leg a little off the ground in front of you, keeping your knee straight, then try to rotate your whole leg out and backward at the hip, that's your piriformis working.




IT BandIliotibial Band. I think a lot of people are under the impression that the IT band is a muscle. In fact, the IT band is a long, tough, fibrous piece of connective tissue that connects to the TFL and glutes at the iliac crest & to the muscles in the tibia at the other end. (Get it? Ilio-tibial?). The IT band is primarily made up of the same type of collagen fibers as your spinal discs, which which gives you an idea just how tough and strong it is. The main role of the IT band is to stabilize the lateral (side-to-side) motion of the upper leg/femur.

How Does A Wobbly Pelvis Cause Running Injuries?

On the left is an example of more or less what your lower body is doing during the support or stance phase if you have a stable pelvis (except that my left leg should really be pushing backward, like in the other picture...sorry). Notice that my hips are level and my right knee is pretty close to directly under my hip. (It is harder for women to align our hips & knees perfectly since we tend to have wider hips than men, but this is pretty decent.) On the right is a slightly exaggerated example of what it's doing if your pelvis is not so stable.

stableunstable

See how in the unstable version my right hip is popped out slightly to the side, my left hip is dropped, and my right knee is (kind of) collapsing inward as it bends? (I've spent so much time working on fixing this that it was really hard for me to do the collapsing knee intentionally, so this isn't the greatest picture for that.) These are the telltale signs of weak hip abductors, the muscles you use to lift your leg sideways away from your body (as opposed to the adductors, which you use to squeeze your thighs together). The prime mover (the muscle that does most of the work) is the glute med, & the synergist muscles (the ones that assist & help control the motion) include the psoas, piriformis, & TFL. These muscles control the IT band, which keeps your femur straight and your hip and knee in alignment.

Here's another picture that shows the collapsing knee idea a little better:

collapsing knee

It's this lateral motion of the support (touching the ground) leg that causes so many problems in runners.

  • IT Band. The IT band tries to stabilize all the wobbling & tilting of the femur, but it can only do so much. Overtaxing the IT band pulls it in a way it isn't really designed to go, causing the underside to rub against some of the knobby bony parts of the femur & resulting in irritation & damage (think of a rope fraying as it's pulled back & forth across a rock). Scar tissue forms where the damage happens, causing a) tightness (scar tissue is tougher & less flexible) & b) more pain (scar tissue is nerve ending-rich).
  • Lateral Knee/Hip. A tight/overworked IT band can create pain & tenderness where it connects to the TFL and glutes (the problem I had) or where it connects to the tibial muscles on the outside of the knee (the more standard ITBS symptom).
  • Patellafemoral. When the hip pops out and the knee collapses inward, a misalignment of the knee joint results. This makes it hard for the patella to slide smoothly over the patellar ligament that connects the quads to the lower leg. The ligament rubs against the underside of the knee cap, causing pain & swelling. (A lot of times this is referred to as 'runner's knee' or patellafemoral syndrome.) This is the problem I had several years ago.
  • MTSS. This collapsing of the knee inward also creates what's known as induced pronation, and probably accounts for a lot of the orthotics & stability shoes out there. Knee collapses in -> lower leg follows knee -> ankle follows lower leg -> foot follows ankle & rolls inward. Excessive pronation is one of the most common causes of medial tibial shin splints. (I've dealt with this on & off for most of my running life.)
  • Piriformis. If the glutes & hip muscles are too weak to control the lateral motion of the femur (resulting in all this hip dropping & knee collapsing), the piriformis will often try to compensate for it. Because it is a synergist muscle when it comes to hip abduction and not a prime mover, it isn't really strong enough to do this, and the result is same as with the IT band -- damage, scar tissue, tightness, and pain. We call this piriformis syndrome.
  • TFL. On the anterior side, the same thing can happen to the TFL (also a synergist in hip abduction). It tries to compensate for the inability of the stabilizer muscles to do their jobs and ends up sore and tight (TFL syndrome).

So what causes all this lateral motion in the upper leg?

It's the job of the IT band to stabilize the femur & keep it moving in a fairly vertical plane between the hip and knee. But remember, the IT band itself is not a muscle -- it's connected to the TFL and glute med. So really, it's the job of the glute med (and its synergist muscles) to stablize the femur via the IT band.

When the glute med, et al. is strong, it's able to use the IT band to keep the femur square and prevent the support knee from collapsing inward. When it's not strong, it can't do this (or can only do it for a little while). It's just the physics of the motion that cause the leg to want to roll in in this way, but when the glute meds & synergist hip abductors aren't strong enough to limit that motion, you get the problems above.

The upshot: If you're going to do any amount of serious mileage, your glutes and hip muscles have to be strong.

Why are weak hip abductors/glutes so common in runners?

Running is primarily a front-to-back motion. Our legs get a lot of work in that direction but almost no work in the rotational / side-to-side direction. Yes, our hip abductors will still work to try to stabilize the lateral motion of your legs through that front-to-back motion, and if you don't run all that much, they might be able to handle it. But the more running you do, the sooner those hip abductors are going to get worn out and overused. This is why paying special attention to strengthening your hips and glutes goes hand-in-hand with building mileage.

Secondly, weak hip abductors/glutes are common in runners because they are common in first-world people in general. It's just a fact that most humans, even those of us who are active a lot, spend a lot of time sitting. I mean, think about a recreational athlete with a typical commuter/office job. Half an hour sitting in the car/bus/train/etc. on the way to work; let's be generous and supposed she manages to spend a grand total of two of the nine hours she spends at work standing or walking & spends the other seven sitting in front of her computer or in meetings; half an hour sitting on the ride home. Again let's be generous and suppose she finds two hours on average in her evening to exercise and be active and do things like make dinner that involve standing and walking. Then maybe she spends three more sitting at the table for dinner, relaxing on the couch, helping kids with homework, sitting at her computer checking email/paying bills/etc., or sitting up in bed reading before she goes to sleep. That's 8 hours sleeping, 4 hours standing/walking/exercising, and 11 hours sitting. (Divide up the remaining hour however you want.) And that's an ACTIVE person who prioritizes exercise.

So what's the problem with sitting? Remember how we talked in the hamstrings post about how complementary muscle groups (muscles that move the same joint in opposite directions, like the biceps & triceps for your elbow) should ideally stay equally strong & flexible, and how imbalances in complementary groups can cause overuse injuries?

When we sit, our hip flexors are shortened and our glutes are lengthened. When we stand, it's the opposite. Our ancestors living on the African savanna three million years ago had a much better balance between the two, resulting in (surprise!) fairly balanced hip flexors & glutes in terms of both strength and tightness. These days, though, even for active folks, tight hip flexors and weak glutes are the norm. (BTW, lower back pressure/pain? Probably the same cause.)

Do your hips/glutes need work?

The simplest DIY way to test your hip/glute strength is with the single-leg quarter squats that I used above to demonstrate a stable pelvis vs an unstable one. First, make sure you're wearing something where you can clearly see what your knee and pelvis are doing (probably not pants, and a top that leaves at least the waistband area of your shorts visible). Stand in front of a mirror and lift one leg off the ground. Note the angle of your waistband -- at this point it should still be pretty much horizontal. Now slowly bend your support knee until you're about a quarter of the way to a full squat position. The following are red flags that can indicate weak hip abductors:

  • You can't do the squat at all (ie, you don't see how you can stand on one leg and bend your knee and still support your body weight). The first time I tried to do it, I was sure I had misunderstood the instructions because it seemed so completely impossible. Nope; I'd just lost a ton of muscle tone in my glute meds.
  • Your knee doesn't stay in alignment with your hip and foot and instead moves inward. (Like I said above, women get a very little additional leeway here, but not much.)
  • Your knee/leg trembles or wobbles as you move through the squat.
  • The hip on your suspended leg drops instead of staying level with your support hip (sometimes it's easiest to see this by watching the waist band of your shorts -- if it tilts as you squat instead of staying parallel to the floor, the hip on your suspended leg is probably dropping)
  • The hip on your support leg pops outward as you squat

Another thing they had me do a lot in PT is jump off of a small box and freeze as I landed. The box was not tall, maybe 18 inches or so, and my instructions were to bend my knees a little to absorb the force of the landing while keeping my back straight as much as possible (ie, not leaning over too much). To assess my hip abductor strength, they would look at what my knees did when I landed. If they stayed pretty much square over my feet as they bent, then my glute meds, et al. were strong enough to do their job & use the IT band to stabilize my femurs and knees. If they collapsed inward, that was an indicator that they still needed work.

stableunstable

Left: A strong, stable landing with knees more or less directly over feet.
Right: An unstable landing with knees collapsing inward.

Last but not least -- Eccentric Strength & Shock Absorption

Your muscles are capable of two types of contractions: concentric, where the muscle shortens (ie, bending your elbow to lift a weight toward your shoulder), and eccentric, where it lengths under a load (ie, gradually straightening your elbow to lower the weight in a smooth, controlled motion rather than just letting your arm fall). Eccentric and concentric are two different types of strength that don't always go hand in hand. You can have good concentric strength in a muscle but poor eccentric strength, or vice versa.

For runners, eccentric strength in the glutes & other hip abductors is essential for preventing injury. When you run, your foot (hopefully) lands directly beneath your hip in order to reduce braking forces and direct most of your energy horizontally and into forward motion rather than vertically down into the ground. Still, even the most beautiful foot strike the world has ever seen will generate some amount of downward force, which in turn generates upward force from the ground to the foot (Newton's 3rd). All that force has to go somewhere.

Concentric strength in your glute meds (as well as most of your other leg muscles) is important for running because that's what you use to push off the ground and propel your body forward. Eccentric strength, on the other hand, is what lets those same muscles lengthen in a smooth and controlled way when your foot hits the ground and your ankle, knee, and hip bend to safely absorb and distribute the upward forces from the ground. (When you do the slow, single-leg squats described above, you're using eccentric strength on the way down and concentric strength on the way up.) Having poor eccentric strength means that instead of gradually lengthening to absorb the force over more time, the muscles lengthens more suddenly, meaning they absorb less force. And the less force that gets absorbed by eccentric muscle contractions, the more ends up channeled into ankles, shins, knees, hips, spine, etc.

To get a better sense of this, think about what would happen if your biceps did not have the eccentric strength to slowly lower a barbell in a controlled way, and instead you could only drop your arm & straighten your elbow suddenly. Instead of the force slowly getting absorbed by your biceps over time, most of it is absorbed suddenly by your elbow joint & its various connective tissues. This is often the mechanism by which “too much / too fast / too soon” leads to strains, stress fractures, & other overuse injuries.

"Think of your muscles as cushions," one of my PTs told me. "The stronger they are, the more they will protect your bones, joints, and connective tissue."

Testing Your Eccentric Strength

Again, the single-leg quarter squats are great. If you're able to slowly lower your hips (keeping them square) a quarter of the way to a full squat without too much shaking or trembling, the eccentric strength in your glute meds is probably pretty good. If you can't do it, or can't go very far, or your knee & femur wobble as you do it, you could probably use some work in this area. (I was not discharged & cleared to train again until I could do 50 in a row on each side pain-free.)

A few other things they constantly looked at when I was in PT included:

  • Vertical hip bounce while running. I would run on a treadmill while they videotaped from the side, and then we would watch to see how much difference there was between the highest point my hip reached in a stride and the lowest. A few inches was okay, but more than that meant that my entire pelvis was dropping as each foot hit the ground because I didn't have the eccentric strength in my glutes to control the downward force.
  • Loud/quiet foot strikes. From my first weeks, they coached me to "run whisper-quiet." Barely audible foot strikes indicate that force is being absorbed & distributed efficiently & safely, while easily audible pounding/slapping indicates poor absorption due to poor eccentric hip/glute strength.
  • Loud/quiet landings on the box jump. Remember how I mentioned they watched me jump off of a box a lot & watched to see what my knees did? They also listened to how loud my feet were when I landed, for the same reason as they did on the treadmill. A soft, quiet landing meant good absorption & eccentric strength, and a loud landing meant I still needed work.

Whew! If you made it all the way through that, then good on you. Hopefully you found at least some part of it informative and/or useful.

For all that I would have loved to avoid four months and many hundreds of dollars in physical therapy last year, I still feel very fortunate to have gotten a chance to learn so much about the details of how running works and how to continue doing it while taking care of my body. In the next post, I'll show the strength exercises I still do, even many months later, to keep my hips and glutes strong and pain-free.

Friday, October 14, 2011

BIONIC!

So my orthotics finally arrived, and not a moment too soon.

In case you've missed all the excitement (by which I mean "excitement"), here's a brief recap of what's been going on around here:

  • I have a moderate case of MTSS that is most likely caused by over-pronation that isn't being corrected sufficiently by stability shoes & semi-custom orthotics.
  • A few weeks of TheraBand exercises to strengthen the small muscles in the lower legs often corrects the trouble but in my case didn't.
  • I tried running in air casts but found them quite uncomfortable to run in for more than a mile and a half -- they felt like vice grips on the back of my foot.
  • Two weeks ago I was fitted for custom orthotics.
  • During those two weeks, I've developed some yucky tendonitis in my left ankle, which is probably also a result of pronation, and a minor (but painful) strain in my right calf, also probably at least partly from the pronation, which resulted in my not being able to run at all for a good five days.

Lately, the tendonitis & calf strain have really been bigger issues than the shin splints. The shin splint pain I can usually run through; this stuff, not so much. (Based on what I've read, I was also more worried about doing more severe damage with those.)

I was able to go back to running on Monday, though still with not-insignificant pain (I cut the run two miles short, but at least I did something). Tuesday's track workout was a little easier, but especially towards the end, I could feel pain in both areas returning. Plan A for Thursday was to get a marathon pace run in early at the track, since my appointment was in Palo Alto at 2:45 & I wasn't sure I'd have time to do it after. Alas, the universe had other plans. A) It was already hot as BALLS when I got there, B) I forgot my water bottle, C) my Garmin died during the .2 mile jog from my car to the track, and D) my various lower leg ailments were already aching by then as well.

Eff this noise, I decided, & walked right back to my car. I'll just take all my stuff with me to the doctor & then go straight to the track after. I figured this was probably for the best anyway, since I'd then have the orthotics.

So let me tell you about them:

  • As you can see, they look kind of like little duck feet, because there's no toe part; they only fill up about 3/4 of the bottom of the shoe.
  • The top is made from some kind of think vinyl-like material, but the rest is HARD hard plastic.
  • When I first put them in my shoes and put them on, they felt really slippery, which worried me. Then Dr. S told me that the customs go underneath the original inserts that came with the shoes.
  • They are guaranteed for two years (as compared to the semi-customs, which are good for about three pairs of shoes, which for me these days works out to about five or six months, depending on the shoe).

orth 1

orth 2

orth 3

Once I had both the orthotics and the original inserts back in the shoes, the difference was immediate. One way or another, these were going to feel a lot different than my old ones. I couldn't wait to go do my 10 mile MP run.

"By the way, sometimes there's a little bit of an adjustment period," says Dr. S., "so be sure to start off with a shorter run to see how they feel. Just a couple of miles, maybe. Don't take them on a ten miler or anything."

Uhhh...okay, I thought. This is going to throw things off a little. But I nodded my assent anyway, because, hey! Custom orthotics!

On my way back to the city, there was a wreck on 101 north, which meant I didn't get home until after 4:30, which meant I was not going to the track, because going to the track at that point would mean getting home around 6:30 and not getting to park my car anywhere. Which was just as well, I figured, given Dr. S's warning about starting off with a shorter run.

But I did need to get at least some MP miles in, so I decided that an easy warm-up mile and five MP miles wasn't too unreasonable, & I could make up the others tomorrow.

And wow! What a difference! No tendonitis pain. Almost no calf pain. Almost no shin pain. Even more remarkable, my lower legs felt almost normal in the hours following the run. (That's normally when they feel the most beaten up.) Incredible.

It's only been one run, so we'll see how things go in the next few days, but as of right now, things are looking pretty good!

Friday, September 30, 2011

Marathon Training, Week 5: In Which Dr. S. Tolerates My Extra-Special Brand of Neurotic

Ah, the smell of wet plaster in the morning...

Today was visit #3 to my PAMF podiatrist, Dr. Saxena.

The briefest of recaps from visits #1 & 2:

  • I have a moderate case of MTSS that is most likely caused by over-pronation that isn't being corrected sufficiently by stability shoes & semi-custom orthotics.
  • A few weeks of TheraBand exercises to strengthen the small muscles in the lower legs often corrects the trouble but in my case didn't.
  • The next steps were to try custom orthotics as a long-term preventative measure & air casts as a temporary measure to let the damaged soft tissue heal. Also, I can keep following my same training schedule as long as I don't experience any bleeding-out-the-eyeballs levels of pain.
  • I got the air casts but found them quite uncomfortable to run in for more than a mile and a half -- they felt like vice grips on the back of my foot.

(You can read about visits #1 & #2 in greater detail here and here, if you're, like, super into reading about podiatry or shin splints or Paula Radcliffe's bunions. Or if you're in the Bay Area & looking for a good podiatrist.)

So I went in today to be fitted for the orthotics. Now, I took my camera & had this whole grand plan involving documenting the process step-by-step, but it turns out to actually be a pretty quick, undramatic process and was over before there was really anything to document. (It also turns out that you have to lay face down on an exam table while you get your feet wrapped in warm plaster, so as you might imagine that is kind of a limiting factor.)

Here is a picture I found on the internet to make up for it.

orthotics fitting 1


It was pretty much like that.

(To prove I'm not completely morally bankrupt, here is the source.)

Regarding the air casts, Dr. S speculated that my feet were still trying to pronate since the orthotics I have aren't quite enough, and rolling against the hard plastic splints (hence the vice-grip-type pain). His take was that, since running in them for 1.5 out of, say, ten miles basically accomplishes nothing, that I should forget about them for now & try them again when I have the custom orthotics (which should take care of the pronation).

While he wrapped & molded my feet in warm plaster, Dr. S & I chatted a bit about running & marathon training in general (remember that he was a competitive high school & college runner & a 2:45 marathoner). I think if you go to see him, it's important to know that he is very straightforward as doctors go and not so much about the beating around the bush and sugarcoating things, which I definitely appreciate. This wasn't too surprising after reading his Yelp reviews, which are mostly quite good with a few abysmal ones here & there. As far as I could tell, people who gave him low ratings seem to want more of an avuncular sycophant who will confirm what they already believe (or want to believe) than a skilled doctor who will be straight with them & get them healthy again.

This was in evidence when he asked me if I had any particular goals for CIM, like qualifying for Boston. I told him about how I thought somewhere in the 3:20 - 3:30 range was probably a reasonable expectation based on my times at other distances, but that since it was my first marathon I was much more concerned with learning the preparation process and having a strong race. He asked me what my 10K time was and I told him around 44 minutes. "Yeah, you've got to be faster than that to run 3:20," he replied frankly. Heh. I'm sure this is completely true and I will be lucky to break 3:30 even if I have a perfect race.

We also talked about my mileage & how I was approaching training. I told him how I had started my marathon training at about 40 miles per week & wanted to peak somewhere between 50 & 55 miles per week. He said he firmly believed that 40 miles a week is about the minimum in terms of getting through a marathon with any modicum of health. (I'm pretty sure he meant people who are running with some sort of time / performance goal in mind, not people whose only goal is to finish.) "But obviously," he added, "the more you can run, the faster you'll be." His opinion seemed to pretty much be that 40 miles / week is a minimum for finishing a marathon safely, healthily, & with a respectable time, and that you really needed to be closer to 80 to really be strong at that distance. He's pretty much the first doctor (or health / fitness professional of any kind) who has actively encouraged me to build mileage as much as possible (without getting injured, obviously) as opposed to constantly warning me to back off, cut back, be conservative, etc.

Finally, we talked briefly about how I am pretty much obsessed with worrying about stress fractures. Our conversation went something like this:

    Me: "So, if I had a stress fracture, I would know it, right? Right? Because I pretty much worry about this every moment of every day."
    Dr. S: "Probably. But not necessarily. They can happen suddenly but it's very rare. You probably should not worry about this every moment of every day."
    Me: "Okay, but how would I know?"
    Dr. S: "Can you hop on one foot?"
    Me: [Hops on one foot]
    Dr. S: "And the other?"
    Me: [Hops on the other]
    Dr. S: "Does it hurt?"
    Me: "No..."
    Dr. S: "Yeah, it's pretty unlikely that you have a stress fracture."
    Me: "Okay, but if I did start to get a stress fracture, how would I know?"
    Dr. S: "So if there's a spot in your leg that pretty much hurts the whole time you're running and then you're limping after, then you might have a stress fracture."
    Me: "Oh, okay. Because my legs don't usually hurt much when I'm running. It's mostly after."
    Dr. S: "Yeah. That's because you don't have a stress fracture."
    Me: "Okay."
    Dr. S: "Seriously. If you had a stress fracture, you probably would not be able to run at all. So chill."
*dramatization

So, you know. That made me feel better.

So yeah. The orthotics should be ready in about two weeks; at that point I'll go back to have them fitted into my shoes (though Dr. S. said I could still take them out & use them in other shoes, just as with my current ones). In the mean time, I'm doing alright, MTSS-wise. Every now & then I get a little stabbing pain in one of my shins, and the medial areas are still very tender after I run, but for the most part it doesn't interfere too much. (Also, ice helps a lot with the pain. Which, all things considered, really isn't all that severe anyway.)

Tune in two weeks from now when SF Road Warrior finally becomes FULLY BIONIC!!

Friday, September 16, 2011

I Do Not Wish to Become Bionic. Or Destitute.

bionic legsOn Monday I went back to the sports podiatrist in Palo Alto (remember? Runner? Boston qualifier? Duathlete? Podiatrist to the Stars? That's the one).

Something I'm learning about doctors is that they always have really high expectations for your body. Typically I will go to have a thing treated, then go back a few weeks later for a follow up; they're like, "So how's it doing?" and I'm like, "Oh, pretty good, it seems to be a little better," or "Oh, great, I'm not incapacitated by pain anymore." Then the doctor will examine whatever it is with a disapproving look and say something like, "This should really be much better by now." This always makes me feel kind of anxious because I feel like s/he is insinuating that I haven't been trying hard enough to make my body heal itself.

So it was with the podiatrist. I've been faithfully doing my TheraBand exercises 4-5 days per week, and although my shin splints are definitely still there, I haven't had any utterly miserable days since my last visit. I assumed this was some kind of progress. Then he started pressing around on my medial tibias until I cried uncle. That was when he got the disapproving look.

Since I've had the shin splints for years, they don't go away with less mileage, and a few weeks of strength exercises hasn't gotten rid of them, he said that the next steps were to try fully custom orthotics and try running in air casts for a while. Sometimes, he said, people are just too biomechanically messed up for their bodies to be able to deal with something like this on their own. (Okay, maybe he didn't put it exactly like that.)

Maybe this doesn't sound like a big huge deal, but it kind of feels like one. I have always been kind of biased against braces and orthotics and such except in the case of serious injuries; everyone I've talked to about it and everything I've read (that's credible) says that the net effect of things like that is to weaken the small stabilizer muscles in the feet & lower legs. (This is where I can hear the minimalist shoe people starting to yell about the evils of modern shoes. Believe me, don't think I haven't thought about trying the creepy toe shoes on the off chance that it makes a difference, but it's not something I can start working on with a marathon in 10 weeks.) Also, the idea of running with all sorts of little pieces of medical technology strapped to my legs and feet makes me feel a little like the Bionic Woman or something, and that's an icky feeling. Like my body, in and of itself, has been officially deemed Not Sufficient.

air castSigh. To be honest, it's kind of a moot point right now. The air casts aren't covered by insurance, and the cheapest I've been able to find them for is about $40 each, so $80ish in all. The orthotics are mostly covered; I'd pay 20% of somewhere between $350-400, so $70-80, plus whatever they'd charge me for the fitting. The fact of the matter, though, is that cost of the marathon and hotel room is probably more than I really should've spent on something I didn't actually need, and I certainly don't have a spare $200+ sitting around to spend on medical bills. (I've already spent $50 on the two visits alone.)

On the other hand, there is a part of me that's sufficiently terrified of having paid for this race and then not being able to run it because the shin splints suddenly went rogue on me that I'm still seriously tempted to just eat the cost of one or the other. These days I get a little panicky any time I feel a sharp pain anywhere in my shins and start hyperventilating about the possibility of ending up with a stress fracture. So maybe it'd be worth it, just for the peace of mind.

Sigh.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Bay Area Excursions: Podiatry Edition

When I worked in Redwood City, taking care of business on the Peninsula was relatively simple. Most things were either on the way to or from work, or, on occasion, not too terribly farther south that the R-Dubs. These days, though, Peninsula business requires a special trip, so I try to save up those errands when I can and take care of them all in one fell sweep.

pep boysTake maintenance on my car, for example. I have a very special six-year relationship with the Pep Boys in San Carlos, and don’t think for a moment that just because I moved 30 miles away that I’m about to go through the torturous process of finding a new auto mechanic in the city. (It does help that my car only requires service every 10,000 miles, and that since moving to SF, I only drive it about 20 miles a week.)

Now, that doesn’t mean I’m going out of my way to make a special trip. Nope; just add it to the pile of Peninsula business to be taken care of the next time it’s convenient.

Somewhat unfortunately, I haven’t had to be on the Peninsula for anything specifically scheduled in a while. About three weeks ago, though, you may recall that I made an appointment with a sports medicine podiatrist in Palo Alto, so this morning I packed all my errands into my service-needing car and left the cold, nasty drizzle of SF for some Peninsula sunshine.

sf to pa

I traveled to the Palo Alto Medical Foundation to see Dr. Amol Saxena. Like my beloved Pep Boys, Dr. Saxena is a good 30 miles away from me. Surely there are perfectly adequate sports podiatrists in San Francisco, you may ask? Well--yes. But after spending countless hours with doctors and physical therapists, one of the biggest things I've learned is that finding the right person to treat you (particularly for a running issue) is everything, and doctors are certainly NOT all created equal. You've got to do your research. So I did mine.

Here are a few of the reasons why I waited three weeks and drove 30 miles to see Dr. Saxena:

    pr bunion
  • He is a runner / duathlete with 13 marathons, several Bostons, and multiple World Duathlon Championships under his belt.
  • He went into podiatry because of his experiences being treated for running injuries in high school and college.
  • He is affiliated professionally with the San Francisco Marathon, Stanford University, Palo Alto Run Club, USA Track & Field, Runner's World, and the Nike Oregon Project.
  • He has / had numerous elite & Olympic runners as patients, including Alan Webb, Paula Radcliffe, Shalane Flanagan, and Alberto Salazar. (I figure if he's good enough for them, he's good enough for me, right? Heh.)

(By the way, those are Paula Radcliffe's bunions, up there. That's what Dr. Saxena fixed for her.)

So yeah. 3 weeks and 30 miles seemed like a small price to pay.

After getting vaguely lost in the small city-state that is Palo Alto Medical Foundation (I always leave ridiculously early for doctor appointments for the same reason I leave ridiculously early for races; it is a sad fact of my existence that if it’s possible to get lost, I will get lost), I finally made it to Dr. Saxena’s exam room, which is hung with race bibs and autographed photos and copies of running magazines picturing athletes he's treated.

When I made the appointment, the receptionist requested that I bring my running shoes and inserts; having recently changed shoes and suspecting that my old shoes might have had something to do with my shin splint flare-up a couple of months ago, I brought my old Kayanos in addition to my new Brooks (also my Mizuno flats, but those didn’t come up much).

A few fun facts about Dr. Saxena:

  • Dr. Saxena can identify the make and model of a running shoe with a sidelong glance.
  • Dr. Saxena can identify your foot / running shoe type by watching you march in place for approximately three seconds and then stand on your tiptoes for approximately two seconds. No fancy pressure pads or treadmill videos for him!
  • Dr. Saxena knows the approximate dates and course profiles of every major road race in the area (and probably a bunch that aren't).
  • Dr. Saxena makes no bones about his opinions of different running shoes.

I’d been telling him about how my shin splints come and go, and how they’d gotten particularly bad in the weeks prior to my changing shoes. I told him about how my Kayanos had sort of felt worn out, even though they’d only had about 380 miles on them.

This kind of made Dr. Saxena laugh a little. As a general rule, he’d told me, Asics last about 250 miles. “They’re comfortable,” he admitted, “but it’s all marketing.” (Dr. Saxena intimated later that he personally could not run more than about 3 miles in a pair of Asics.) The Brooks, on the other hand, he told me, should last 350-400 miles. I find this kind of hilarious, given that the Kayanos generally cost ~40% more than the Brooks Adrenalines.

Dr. Saxena did not have strong feelings about my orthotics except to say that the reason I’ve been feeling as if I have stone bruises on the balls of my feet could be that they are slightly too long in the heel, causing the orthotic to ride slightly forward in my shoe relative to the part of my foot that it’s been molded to. That means that the very front part of the arch is essentially pressing up on the ball of my foot (where there is apparently a cluster of rather temperamental nerves). Dr. Saxena advised taking the orthotics back to Roadrunner Sports and asking them to trim up the heels a little.

Like everyone else who’s ever looked at my feet and legs, Dr. Saxena seemed pretty positive that my shin splints were caused by moderate pronation and the tiny muscles in my lower legs not being strong enough to pull them back into alignment completely with each stride. For this, he recommended strengthening exercises with a Theraband. For the pain, he recommended regular icing (which is my usual approach anyway). We did talk briefly about ibuprofen, and it seems that Dr. Saxena agrees with my best buddy K-Starr on that point: Ibuprofen is known to interfere with the healing and strengthening process, and the relative benefits (barring a significant injury like a sprained joint) are minimal.

For the next three weeks, I am to continue running normally & increasing my mileage, do my daily Theraband exercises (sidenote: I wonder what percentage of my life I’ve spent doing Theraband exercises?), and ice for pain. On Sept. 12, I am to see Dr. Saxena again for a follow-up. He seemed to think that my particular case is a fairly mild one, if chronic, and that the Theraband work should take care of things. On the off chance that it doesn’t, he described to me a few more options that are sometimes necessary in more severe cases:

  • Fully custom orthotics (~$400; The Footbalance ones that Roadrunner Sports will do in-house for you are more semi-custom, according to Dr. S., but if they work, they work.)
  • Aircast ankle braces
  • Shockwave therapy (to break down scar tissue in the tib med area)

Rad!

After my visit with Dr. Saxena, I went to Pep Boys and had my car serviced, then popped over to Roadrunner Sports (just a few blocks over) to explain about my inserts. To my great pleasure, they did better than just trim it up; they replaced the too-long-in-the-heel inserts with a brand spankin' new set in a smaller size. Thanks, guys! After that, a few more errands on the Peninsula, then back home (where, thankfully, it was no longer drizzly and nasty).

So we'll see how the Theraband exercises go. They are yet new and different from any other shin splints exercises anyone has ever prescribed for me, so I'm willing to try them for a few weeks (hey, it's Dr. Saxena, after all!). I'll keep you updated on how it goes. In the mean time, if you're local and find yourself in the market for a podiatrist who gets runners, you might consider heading over to PAMF.

Monday, August 15, 2011

A Few Myths About Orthotics

orthoticsDue to mild pronation, I've run in a stability shoe for as long as I've been getting my shoes professionally fitted. That was towards the beginning of college; before that I honestly can't say what type of shoe I was running in, because my basic approach was to try on a bunch of running shoes until I found ones that felt comfortable. Then there was the one year we couldn't afford shoes and my coach gave me a pair to wear for the season, which I think were actually used and already worn out. Given all that, it's probably not surprising that I suffered from horrendous shin splints for years that all manner of leg and foot exercises did nothing to fix. Around the same time that I started wearing a stability shoe, I also started trying to switch to a forefoot strike; between these two things, my shin splints all but disappeared in a few months.

Earlier this year, I got really curious about racing flats and started looking into getting a pair for shorter races. At the time, flats weren't something I knew much about. In high school I wore spikes for time trials and races 1600 m or shorter or regular trainers for workouts and two mile races; it never occurred to me that there was any other option. (Mostly I wanted them for 5Ks & 10Ks - it's hard for me to imagine running farther than that with that little cushioning.) In an effort not to walk into a running store completely clueless on the topic, I tried to at least do some research on how flats are fitted compared to trainers and what different types exist. Alas, there wasn't as much detailed information out there (at least that I was able to find) as I'd hoped. So, armed with precious little knowledge beyond the basics, I put myself in the hands of the shoe people at Roadrunner Sports.

And I learned a few things right away. First, that there are two types of racing flats: performance neutral or "true" flats (very little in the way of cushion and support), and performance stability shoes (slightly more support, mostly aimed at preventing overpronation). After video-taping a few seconds of me running barefoot, they confirmed what I already knew: high arches + flexible ankles = not insignificant overpronation. Which, one of the salespeople explained to me, meant that running in a true racing flat was probably out of the question.

On the off chance that it might help, they did a quick custom orthotic for me and we did a few more videos of me running in the neutrals with the orthotics. It made some difference, but not really enough. Next, we tried a few different performance stability shoes. In those videos, my pronation looked similar to when I was wearing the neutrals with orthotics. When we added the orthotics to the stability shoes, the pronation was almost gone. So I left that day with my Mizuno Musha Wave 3's and a pair of molded inserts.

In the last couple of months before this, the shin splints I thought I had banished back in college had been sneaking back up on me. They weren't as bad as they had been; just noticeable enough to be annoying (and worry me a little). On the off chance that it might do some good, I started switching the molded inserts into my trainers when I wore them. (It didn't.) As I've mentioned lately, I think they've been getting better in the last few weeks; I'm now running in my new Brooks and the molded inserts in an effort to add every little bit of stability I can.

It's been a while since I discussed all this with someone with an actual medical degree, though, so recently, I made an appointment with a sports medicine podiatrist, just to see what he thinks. Then today, I ran across another Gina Kolata article regarding orthotics and running.

That was kind of a bummer.

Well; sort of. It turns out that yes, orthotics really do work in a lot of cases in that they often do let people run or walk more or less pain-free when they weren't able to before. On the other hand, there's apparently a lot of bad information out there about orthotics as well. The article goes into a lot of detail, but here's what I took away from it in terms of myth-busting:

Myth#1: Doctors understand how orthotics work. Apparently they don't, really. It's more a process of trial and error than anything else.

Myth #2: Doctors can predict what effect a given orthotic will have on a given patient's biomechanics. Unfortunately, ten patients with the same biomechanical problem may react to the same orthotic in ten different ways. Depending on how a certain patient responds, the issue may get better, worse, or stay the same.

Myth #3: Orthotics change a person's running form & kinematics (how the skeleton moves during running). Even when a patient reports that orthotics are working, there is rarely evidence that s/he is actually moving differently as a result of the orthotics. (On the other hand, there is evidence that wearing orthotics can reduce muscle strength.)

Myth #4: There is good scientific / medical evidence that orthotics prevent injury. There isn't. There are lots of studies, but most of them are not scientific or lack rigor. That doesn't mean that orthotics don't prevent injury in certain cases, just that there is no real evidence that they do. (The article does site one well-controlled scientific study where orthotics did appear to reduce injury in a group of soldiers; but again, even in the soldiers who suffered fewer injuries, the researchers did not see evidence that the orthotics changed anything about their biomechanics. Also, the soldiers chose their own orthotics based purely on what they thought was comfortable, without any input from a doctor at all.)

The article wraps up with some advice from a professor of biomechanics: Instead of turning to orthotics right away, he says, most athletes would do better to instead work on strengthening the muscles in the affected parts of their legs.

So really, who knows whether those custom inserts are really doing anything for me or not? I'll definitely be very interested to see what the podiatrist has to say about all this next week.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Weather / Patterns

rainy SFOn my way home from work today, I listened to people talking on the radio about record-breaking heat in places like Indiana, Arkansas, and Texas & how people are being warned to stay inside if at all possible due to heat advisories; my Facebook friends are posting sad things about broken air conditioners and outdoor activities; a couple of running sites are running articles about how to run safe in the heat and stay hydrated.

I, on the other hand, went to work today in a sweater, jeans, and a rain shell, and ran the heater in the car.

rainy KezarI also had a track workout scheduled for this afternoon, and let me tell you just how excited I was to get out there in the wind/cold/drizzle. (Alright, I know it's not real cold, but it's too cold for my preference, and the wind makes it worse.) It made me so incredibly sad to discover I'd already gone through my three pairs of running tights this week; instead, I made due with the longest pair of shorts I have and a long-sleeve tech shirt. Kezar Stadium has been a happier place to be, that is for certain.

soft paints and teaOn the other hand, there is a certain satisfaction to completing a run in nasty weather, then curling up inside on the couch for the rest of the day. Nothing follows a nasty weather workout better than soft pants and hot tea. :)

In addition to my soft pants and tea, I am treating myself to a couple of those freaky blue ice packs. A pattern seems to be developing, and it appears to involve track workouts.

My speed work has gone through a bit of evolution lately. In May and June, I was running a lot of hard 400 repeats, usually 10-12 at a time. A few weeks into that was when my shin splints started acting up again. I'd feel fine after a long run Sunday, take Monday off, run 10-12 x 400 on Tuesday, starting having med tib pain, take Wednesday off, and then end up either cutting my Thursday run short, feeling miserable after it, or just skipping it altogether and then trying to run Friday and Saturday if I could.

ice packsThis pattern went on for a few weeks. Then I basically took a week off while we were in Chicago. The week after that (last week) I did a track workout, but mile repeats at 5K pace instead of 400s, and felt great. (Slower pace = less pounding? A week of rest? Who can say?) Now I am changing things up again to better align with my 10K goals and alternating weeks between five-minute intervals at 5K pace and ten-minute intervals at 10K pace. Today I did the five-minutes, planning to do five, and knew after just a couple that I would need to cut back unless I wanted to ruin the rest of my training week. I did four, but I've been having mild shin AND Achilles tendon (!) pain in both legs since (ie, a couple of hours).

I don't think it's anything too serious; it's not the level of pain I was having a few weeks ago, and I've definitely become less hesitant about cutting things short as soon as I feel it, even if it's pretty mild. Since the 10Ks are really a means to an end, I'm trying to do my best to take the long view and invest in my fall half marathon by running less mileage and spending more time recovering when I need it so that I'll be stronger and able to run more later on. It's frustrating, but I think that if I'm conservative about my speed work, sandwich it between rest days, and ice both my shins and Achilles tendons consistently when I'm having pain, I'll end up having a better fall.